Dialogue invites us to bring our commitments to each conversation and calls for patience, humility, curiosity, and courage. The outcome of dialogue does not require agreement, and meaningful relationships can exist even where there are irreconcilable differences. We believe that dialogue around religious difference deepens understanding and is an essential tool for connecting communities.
Effective dialogue requires more than just talking — it calls for intentional listening, curiosity, and respect. This downloadable resource outlines key habits that distinguish dialogue from debate and help you engage more constructively.
Meaningful relationships endure even amid deep differences.
ICJS offers Can We Talk? Urgent Interreligious Conversations in a Time of War—resources to help communities engage difficult conversations on Israel and Gaza, with attention to identities and issues shaped by religious difference.
Here are some common objections to interreligious dialogue that individuals must courageously grapple with before entering a conversation on Israel and Gaza, or any topic where participants are deeply divided, writes Heather Miller Rubens.
Rubens draws a distinction between two impulses that animate interreligious work. “God-seekers” enter dialogue hoping for spiritual insight, wisdom, or a deeper encounter with the Divine. “Neighbor-seekers” come looking to strengthen relationships across religious and cultural boundaries
ICJS Jewish Scholar Ben Sax’s forthcoming book, Is Dialogue Possible? The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and the Question of Antisemitism argues that accusations of antisemitism—while sometimes accurate—are also frequently weaponized to shut down discussion.
This course considered what it means to dialogue during a time of political violence, persecution, gaslighting, and oppression. Very often we teach that tolerance is a virtue in dialogue, yet should we also be tolerant of intolerance?
Martin Buber is one the most influential thinkers of the 20th century. This course explored his notion of dialogue as expressed in his corpus of writing, ranging from comparative mysticism to biblical commentary, existentialism to poetry, philosophy to cultural Zionism, and psychology to diplomacy.
I and Thou, Martin Buber’s 1923 magnum opus, is the classic text articulating a philosophy of dialogue. ICJS Jewish Scholar Ben Sax shares his insights into this concept that is both seemingly simple and at the same time deeply profound. View the accompanying Discussion Guide: https://icjs.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Buber-Video-Discussion-Curriculum.pdf